A subject dear to my heart particularly this month as
filling in my ESA (employment and support allowance) paperwork I have worried
about the outcome where I may have to go back to work particularly as I’m not fit;
but then what is fit for work? (see The Governments understanding gap with ESA )
I have looked again at the statistics released by the DWP
(department of work and pensions) and see rather alarmingly
that they have restricted the report even further and I have found it
impossible to find out how many people are appealing and how many are having
their appeals upheld. The current figures show that little has changed.
64% of claimants were entitled to benefit with 39% placed in
the WRAG (work related activity group) and 25% placed in the SG (support group).
found on page 11 for the last quarter with robust figures Dec 2011 o Feb 2012.
If you look at this table it shows the steady increase in the number of people
assessed as fit for work.
|
|
Percentage of completed assessment caseloads
|
||||
|
|
Outcomes of claims where functional assessment
has been completed
|
||||
|
|
Entitled to Employment and Support Allowance:
|
Fit for Work
|
Any outcome
|
||
|
National
roll-out (monthly)3:
|
Work Related Activity Group
|
Support Group
|
Either group
|
||
|
Mar-11
|
42%
|
34%
|
76%
|
24%
|
100%
|
|
Apr-11
|
39%
|
31%
|
71%
|
29%
|
100%
|
|
May-11
|
37%
|
30%
|
67%
|
33%
|
100%
|
|
Jun-11
|
38%
|
29%
|
66%
|
34%
|
100%
|
|
Jul-11
|
41%
|
28%
|
69%
|
31%
|
100%
|
|
Aug-11
|
43%
|
25%
|
68%
|
32%
|
100%
|
|
Sep-11
|
43%
|
24%
|
67%
|
33%
|
100%
|
|
Oct-11
|
44%
|
23%
|
67%
|
33%
|
100%
|
|
Nov-11
|
43%
|
23%
|
66%
|
34%
|
100%
|
|
Dec-11
|
41%
|
23%
|
64%
|
36%
|
100%
|
|
Jan-12
|
38%
|
25%
|
64%
|
36%
|
100%
|
|
Feb-12
|
37%
|
28%
|
65%
|
35%
|
100%
|
So despite the better press it seems that I still have just
as much of chance of being put out to work. Whether that means I or anyone else
are more or less likely to be incorrectly assessed remains to be seen and as
there doesn’t appear to be any data on how many people are appealing or whether
decisions are being up held it’s anybody’s guess.
That aside would going back to work improve my mental
health?
Well I would say not especially as once I had given up work
my symptoms decreased, but is it good for people in general?
Well some would say yes and if you look at this report
where it was found that of based on
interviews with 2,136 16-to-25-year-olds
The report reveals that while 27 per cent of young
people in work feel down or depressed 'always' or 'often', this increases to
almost half (48 per cent) among NEETs (not in employment, education or
training)
It certainly appears so for young people. I guess having had
so many years of people telling me one thing and then finding out that for me
it had only made my problems worse I am somewhat sceptical. That for some
people it definitely helps I don’t doubt as I have seen many gain in confidence
and self worth however how widespread is this ‘better off with work’ feeling?
Well this can be found on the royal college of psychiatrist’s website
Studies show that work is generally good for
health. As well as a
financial reward, it gives many of us self-esteem, companionship and status.
There is good
evidence that being out of work or 'workless' is bad for your health. People
who are unemployed have poorer physical and mental health overall. They consult
their GP more, are more likely to be admitted to hospital, and have higher
death rates. The figures are stark. For example, people who are unemployed for
more than 12 weeks are between 4 and 10 times more likely to suffer from
depression and anxiety. Unemployment is also linked with increased rates of
suicide. People who are ill are also more likely to be unable to work. But, the
consensus is that being 'workless' is the cause, and poor health is the effect.
Some studies
go so far as to conclude that the risk to health of being out of work, in the
longer term, is greater than the risk of other killer diseases such as heart
disease.
Returning to
work after a period of illness, including mental ill-health, actually helps
recovery and is the best way to prevent long-term sickness. The health status
of people of all ages improves when they move off benefits and into work. This
is true for people with mild or severe mental health problems. It is not
surprising then, that the vast majority of people who are out of work, and use
mental health services, want to return to or to start work.
This assumes that your work is safe and satisfying. Some workplaces are unhealthy, and may
have helped to contribute to or exacerbate mental ill-health in the first
place. So returning to work or starting
to work after a period of mental ill-health has to be the right work, in the
right place, with support from colleagues, carers and health professionals.
I find it interesting though that they talk at the beginning
about work, whether paid or unpaid and then quote figures about people who are
unemployed...since unemployment and being un-working is not the same thing. For
instance does a mother not work when she is looking after her child although
she may not be employed to do so?
This might seem strange but if worklessness is so bad then how come so many of our elderly is
living such long lives. I mean really they have been work less for many
years and they seem to cope quite well. Granted the older you get the more
likely you are to suffer from depression but
still if you’re talking being out of work for 12 weeks or more before they are
4 to 10 times more likely to suffer from depression and anxiety I would have
thought that there would be a lot more people suffering in their old age.
I have glanced over the summary of results from the DWP’s,
Is work good for your health and well-being? Document
and in their provisos section after their conclusion that on average work is
good for you well being it states
Beneficial health effects depend on the nature and
quality of work (though there is insufficient evidence to define the physical
and psychosocial characteristics of jobs and workplaces that are ‘good’ for
health);
Which kind of suggests they have no real idea; it helps on
average but they don’t know why, which is really going to help people when they
come to choosing a job/ workplace and as the royal college also stated it
matters that you get the right work/ work place. I’m still ill at ease with the
idea of going into a workplace without knowing if it doesn’t work out that you
can give it up without sanctions from the benefits agency and I am sure that
many others also feel this way.
However the question still remains as to whether work because
I see on the one hand we have an elderly population that doesn’t seem to suffer
any of the so called ill effects of being out of work despite being so for many
years and the working age population that certainly is being affected by them
and I wonder whether the relationship between work and good health isn’t far
more complicated than first thought.
There are many things that could contribute such as
1.
A secure income to live on i.e. having a pension
2.
Public opinion about you should be working as opposed
to contributing
3.
Current level of poverty versus surroundings and
work being a way to change that
4.
Contact with people outside of family and the
ability to do so when not working of working age
5.
Public opinion on worth of task, for instance
changing attitudes to stay at home mums, or carers for relatives
6.
Current economic instability
But then maybe none of that matters; maybe the overriding factor
is about occupation and worth and once retired people are finding occupation
without a job where as those of working age are not, they are just looking for
work. And since they have worked and got a pension they don’t have the push of
the knowledge that they should be working, that it is expected of them and they
are not like those of working age.
No comments:
Post a Comment