You may have noticed a distinct lack of comment from me on
the mental rethinks anti stigma campaign first phase report and as this would
appear to be right up my street, so to speak, it would seem a big omission.
Well apart from my earlier exposé on the research done prior to the full
campaign and sadly concluding that such campaigns are extremely difficult to
manage or evaluate effectiveness of them I found that I had nothing more to add
than had already been reported.
Well until now that is and as a first thought I would like
to say that much as most people have reported good news this article in the guardian did not.
While notable improvement was recorded over the four
surveys on measures including discrimination by friends and by family, there
was no comparable change in discrimination by mental health professionals:
34.3% of respondents reported such treatment in 2008, falling only slightly –
and not statistically significantly - to 30.4% in 2011.
Although the argument
is sound I find myself repeating ‘Aren’t all medical professionals also
friends, family member and associates of those who are suffering mental health
problems’ and as such were just as targeted an audience as everyone else. That
none of the campaigns specifically looked at working with the mentally ill is
true but really it seems the lack of improvement goes far beyond the cynical
view point a worker can get about their job that was suggested in that article
I feel they really do need to look at why this group of
people did not respond as positively to the campaign as others. This article
goes on to give reasons but I think the most telling and the one that I feel
most appropriate is about burn out
and how it relates to what can be termed secondary
traumatic stress.
So what is that?
Well this is what Wikipedia has to say
Compassion fatigue, also known as secondary
traumatic stress (STS), is a condition characterized by a gradual lessening
of compassion
over time. It is common among individuals that work directly with trauma
victims such as nurses, psychologists, and first responders.
...
Sufferers can exhibit several symptoms including hopelessness, a decrease in
experiences of pleasure, constant stress and anxiety, sleeplessness or
nightmares, and a pervasive negative attitude. This can have detrimental
effects on individuals, both professionally and personally, including a
decrease in productivity, the inability to focus, and the development of new
feelings of incompetency and self doubt
I’m no expert but still I find that quite a lot of that
rings true for some of the medical staff that I have met. I am also reminded of
an article in the guardian from 2011 that stated
Average bed occupancy rates in English inpatient units
are much higher than the 85% standard, with some wards running at 120%
occupancy
...The report reveals that more than half of all adult
general wards run at more than 100% occupancy, with 16% meeting the required target.
Just 21% of acute wards meet the 85% target
...Daily one-to-one contact with nursing staff is less
than that accepted as being conducive to recovery
Not in the same order as in
the article
Well if this is still the case or even close then it is no
wonder these particular staff have trouble with compassion. At least half of
all staff on mental health wards are working beyond what’s expected of them are
not meeting the requirements considered to give recovery.
And please remember that it is not just staffing levels that
can cause problems the care quality commission report into hospital safety has
shown that there is a more widespread problem with 17 hospitals, 8 of which
mental health trust, were found to be non compliant on safety inspections and set
deadlines for improvement. ( as reported in the guardian)
I think if you were working over and above the expected
levels you also would have a problem.
But is there really a problem?
Well I found this article on Compassion fatigue in health professionals
and granted it’s not overly current but
it has this to say
Statistics Canada recently published their first ever
National Survey of the Work and Health of Nurses (2005) which found that “close
to one-fifth of nurses reported that their mental health had made their
workload difficult to handle during the previous month.”
The Bristish Journal of Psychiatry published a similar
article about mental health, burnout and job satisfaction among mental health social workers in England and Wales in 2006 in which they quoted
With 81% of local authorities in the UK reporting
problems recruiting and retaining social workers, staffing is more problematic in
social work than in any other professional group (Employers’ Organisation &
Provincial Employers’ Organisations,2002)
And in the conclusions and discussion it points out that
The most striking findings of the survey are the very high levels of stress and emotional exhaustion
in the sample.
... The GHQ-positive rate
was 47% using the cut-off of 4, which
was almost double the rate for consultant psychiatrists (25%;Pajak et al,
2003) and nearly three times the level
in the general population (17%;Department of Health, 1995). Similarly, mean
scores for emotional exhaustion were higher than for psychiatrists (Pajak et al,
2003) and mean scores on all three burnout sub-scales were higher than norms
for the mental health workforce (Maslach & Jackson,1986).
Which kind of suggest that these particular people may well
be suffering far more burnout and therefore more lack of compassion than the
rest of the population, which might explain why their attitudes to mental ill health
have not improved.
And instead of worrying about their attitudes it might be worth improving the working conditions by reducing the stress and providing better support for them as suggested in the article.
Particularly as they
also suggest that this will likely affect staff retention and recruitment in
the future. Equally it might well be worth considering that more staff to
clients would improve things immensely.
No comments:
Post a Comment